| Glycobiology | Pages |
Exchange of Ser-4 for Val, Leu or Asn in the sequon Asn-Ala-Ser does not prevent N-glycosylation of the cell surface glycoprotein from Halobacterium halobium
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
References
Exchange of Ser-4 for Val, Leu or Asn in the sequon Asn-Ala-Ser does not prevent N-glycosylation of the cell surface glycoprotein from Halobacterium halobium
Introduction
It is commonly accepted that the tripeptide consensus sequence Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr (`sequon') is a necessary condition for N-glycosylation of proteins. This N-glycosylation rule is derived from many examples of the GlcNAc(1-N) linkage type. Within this sequon, Xaa can be any amino acid except proline. In addition, it appears that cysteine can substitute for serine/threonine in certain cases (Bause and Legler, 1981; Stenflo and Fernlund, 1982; Titani et al., 1986). Even N-glycans of prokaryotic glycoproteins were shown to be linked to asparagines within the Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr motif, although they exhibit a different linkage type, namely, GalNAc(1-N) or Glc(1-N) (Sumper, 1987; Lechner and Wieland, 1989; Sumper and Wieland, 1995). For example, the cell surface glycoprotein (CSG) of Halobacterium halobium exhibits a sulfated repeating unit pentasaccharide linked via N-acetylgalactos-amine to Asn-2 of the N-terminal sequence Ala-Asn-Ala-Ser- (Wieland et al., 1982; Paul and Wieland, 1987). Dolichol diphosphate-linked saccharides are involved in the biosynthesis of this halobacterial N-glycan (Wieland et al., 1981).
Transfection (Mevarech and Werczberger, 1985) and transformation (Charlebois et al., 1987; Cline and Doolittle, 1987) of halobacteria have been established. Subsequently, shuttle vectors have been developed which are very useful for recombination experiments (Lam and Doolittle, 1989; Ni et al., 1990; Holmes et al., 1991, 1994; Krebs et al., 1991; Pfeifer et al., 1994). Furthermore, a gene replacement technique has been described which allows the site directed mutagenesis of single genes of the halobacterial genome (Ferrando et al., 1993; Krebs et al., 1993a,b). Using these techniques, we intended to investigate the biological function of N-glycosylation in the CSG of H.halobium.
Bacitracin treated cells synthesize CSG lacking the N-glycan at Asn-2 and this results in the formation of spheroblasts suggesting that the sulfated repeating unit saccharide is necessary for stabilization of the rod shaped morphology of H.halobium cells (Wieland et al., 1980). To exclude possible side effects caused by bacitracin treatment, the glycosylation site has been mutated using the genetic techniques now available. The sequon has been deleted by replacing serine-4 with valine, leucine and asparagine, respectively. According to the N-glycosylation rule deduced from conventional glycoproteins, this mutation should create a cell surface glycoprotein which is no longer glycosylated at Asn-2.
In contrast to this assumption, we show in this paper that the hydroxyamino acid in this particular Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr sequon is not necessary for N-glycosylation.
Results
Construction of the transformation vector
Synthetic oligonucleotides have been prepared corresponding to nucleotide 100-132 of the csg open reading frame in which the AGC triplet coding for Ser-4 is converted to triplets coding for Gly, Val, Leu, Ile, and Asn, respectively. Simultaneously, the nucleotide sequence has been changed at this site to generate a new cutting site for an appropriate restriction endonuclease without a further change of the encoded amino acid sequence. This additional cutting site turned out to be very helpful for the subsequent screening procedure. By recombinant PCR and subcloning, the mutation was inserted in the csg gene. For construction of transformation vectors a 5.0 kb SmaI fragment has been used derived from pUC8-15 (Lechner and Sumper, 1987) carrying the complete csg gene together with about 1 kb 5[prime] and 3[prime] flanking regions to facilitate effective recombination. Fragments with the mutated csg gene have been inserted in the shuttle vector pWL-102 carrying the mevinolin resistance gene for selection in H.halobium. The resulting transformation vectors have been denoted pRZ-csgG4, pRZ-csgV4, pRZ-csgL4, pRZ-csgI4, and pRZ-csgN4 (commonly designated pRZ-csgX4, with X indicating the introduced amino acid residue). A restriction map for pRZ-csgV4 is shown in Figure
Figure 1. Restriction map analysis of homologous recombination events with pRZ-csgV4. Recombination between the csgV4 sequence on plasmid pRZ-csgV4 and on the corresponding genomic sequence results in the integration of the plasmid and duplication of the homologous DNA. Depending on the location of the integration site relative to the mutated site (a or b) two different configurations are obtained. The mutation site is indicated as a vertical black bar. Integration upstream results in transformant A with configuration a, downstream in transformant B with configuration b. The location of the relevant EcoRI (E), BamHI (B) and SalI (S) restriction sites on the plasmid and on the chromosome are indicated, as well as the size of the fragments that will arise after digestion with SalI or EcoRI-BamHI restriction endonucleases. The genomic DNA is indicated by broad black lines and gray boxes and the plasmid regions by small dotted lines and white boxes. The figure is not drawn to scale. Isolation of csgV4 mutants
The detailed analysis of transformants and mutants is described for the isolation of csgV4 mutants. Vectors are predominantly integrated into the halobacterial genome by homologous recombination. Integration of the mutagenesis vector at the csg gene locus should produce two possible arrangements (a or b) as shown in Figure
Probing an EcoRI-BamHI digest of genomic DNA with the coding region of csg labels a 10.5kb fragment in the wild type csg gene environment and a 12.1 kb fragment in the pRZ-csgV4 mutagenesis vector construct. Diagnostic for successful insertion of pRZ-csgV4 into the genomic DNA of transformants is a hybridization signal at 7.2 and 15.4 kb (Figures
Figure 2. Southern blot analysis of csgV4 transformants and mutants. Total genomic DNA of wild type H.halobium cells (lane 1), transformant B (lane 3), transformant A (lane 4), mutant A (lane 5), and mutant B (lane 6) was digested with EcoRI-BamHI (A) or SalI (B). The EcoRI-BamHI digestion was hybridized with a 35S-labeled 5 kb SmaI-fragment containing the complete csg sequence. A mixture of pRZ-csgV4 and pUC8-15 served as standard and was applied in lane 2 of (A). For the SalI blot, a 35S-labeled PCR-fragment derived from ON3, ON2, and pRZ-csgV4 as template was used for hybridization. pRZ-csgV4 applied in lane 2 of (B) served as standard. For the interpretation of the resulting patterns see Figure 1. The SalI blot shows an additional 240 bp fragment in lanes 2-5 which can only be observed after prolonged exposure of the film.
One clone each of transformant A and B were further propagated and screened for recombination events causing mevinolin sensitivity. Two out of 250 transformants type A and 3 clones out of 250 transformants type B became sensitive and were further analyzed by Southern blotting. All mevinolin sensitive recombinants derived from transformant type B (now denoted mutant B) revealed the wild type arrangement at the csg gene locus (Figure Isolation of csgX4 mutants by diagnostic restriction analysis
In analogy to the isolation of the csgV4 mutant additional csgX4 mutants have been isolated after transformation of H.halobium with the respective mutation vectors. This time, however, a PCR based approach has been used to identify genotypes of transformants and mutants. Transformed halobacteria have been screened for type A transformants by analyzing a PCR-fragment generated with an oligonucleotide (ON15U2) that primes upstream of the mutated 5 kb fragment. The presence of the respective additional cutting site (originally introduced together with the mutated codon) in this PCR-fragment is indicative for the type A transformant genotype. From their respective type A transformants, csgL4 and csgN4 mutants could easily be obtained from revertants and identified by this diagnostic restriction analysis (Figure
Figure 3. Identification of mutated genotypes by diagnostic restriction analysis. PCR fragments amplified from genomic DNA of csgV4, csgL4, and csgN4 mutants were created with oligonucleotide ON15U2 and ON2. For the csgV481 mutant ON15U2 and ON64 were used. The fragments were digested with the respective restriction endonucleases as indicated and subsequently analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. At the left side of the respective mutation analysis the corresponding control with wild type (WT) genomic DNA is shown. pRZ-csg corresponds to a PCR-fragment amplified from pRZ-csgV4 with the oligonucleotides ON3 and ON2. Characterization of mutant cells
Even in crude cell lysates, the sulfated cell surface glycoprotein can easily be detected by SDS-PAGE. Highly unexpectedly, the glycoproteins synthesized in csgX4 mutant cells exhibited the same mobility as the wild type CSG. However, it is known from previous work (Wieland et al., 1980) that CSG lacking the repeating unit saccharide exhibits a significant higher mobility in SDS-PAGE analysis compared with wild type CSG. This result indicated that the cell surface glycoproteins derived from all the csgX4 mutants may still carry the sulfated repeating unit saccharide on Asn-2. This is further supported by the fact that the mutant cells had retained a rod shaped appearance, indistinguishable from wild type cells. Therefore, a detailed chemical analysis of the N-terminal region of the mutant polypeptides has been initiated. Preparation of the tryptic N-terminal peptide
Membrane preparations from csgX4 mutant cells were digested with trypsin. The N-terminal peptides of the csg were purified by previously established procedures (Paul et al., 1986). Gas phase sequencing of the respective peptide from csgV4 mutant resulted in the amino acid sequence Ala-Xaa-Ala-Val-Asp-Leu-Asn-Asp-Tyr-Gln-Arg confirming the mutation at position 4 (Figure
Figure 4. Sequencing of the tryptic N-terminal peptide of CSGV4. Chromatographic separation of the products of the first (1), second (2), third (3), and fourth (4) cycle from the Edman degradation is shown. In cycle 2, no amino acid derivative can be detected. Traces of alanine derivative in cycles 2 and 4 derive from the preceding cycle. Peaks at the retention time of 4 min and 15 min are due to the sequencing system. Characterization of the sugar moiety
The sugars possibly linked to the purified N-terminal peptides of the cell surface glycoproteins from csgX4 mutants have been determined by gas chromatographic analysis of their pentafluoropropionyl-methyl-glycosides. The resulting chromatograms exhibited exactly the same pattern of sugars as found for the wild type glycopeptide, i.e., the presence of galacturonic acid, 3-O-methyl-galacturonic acid, galactose, N-acetylglucosamine, and N-acetylgalactosamine could be confirmed. This is consistent with the structure depicted in Figure
Figure 5. Sugar composition of the tryptic N-terminal peptide of CSGV4. Pentafluoropropionylation of methylglycosides derived from the glycopeptide results in the formation of four different derivatives for each sugar which can be separated by gc analysis. GalUA, Galacturonic acid; 3mGalUA, 3-O-methyl-galacturonic acid; Gal, galactose; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; GalNAc, N-acetylgalactosamine. Gal 2, 3mGalUA 3, and GlcNAc 4 are not detected due to the low amounts of these products.
Figure 6. Analysis of tryptic peptides of CSG and CSGV481. CSG and CSGV481 were isolated from wild type H.halobium and csgV481 mutant cells as described in Materials and methods and digested with trypsin. The resulting peptides were separated by reversed phase chromatography, monitored at 220 nm and subsequently analyzed by on-line ES-MS. Top: mass spectrum of the respective glycopeptide derived from wild type CSG. Bottom: mass spectrum of the mutated peptide derived from CSGV481. Isolation of csgV481 mutants
To get information about the behavior of a different type of N-glycosylation site within the csg, a csgV481 mutant was created. Analysis of the genotype is shown in Figure Replacement of Asn-2 failed to produce viable cells
In addition to the experiments described above, we tried to create a mutant with a single point mutation at Asn-2 of the CSG. This mutation should completely prevent N-glycosylation of CSG with the repeating unit pentasaccharide. However, we failed to detect transformants with correct integration of the mutagenized csg gene. This indicates that H.halobium cells with a CSG lacking the repeating unit saccharide chain may no longer be viable.
Marshall (1972, 1974) established from many examples a rule for effective N-glycosylation concerning the instruction encoded within the polypeptide chain. Since then it is commonly accepted, that N-glycosylation requires the tripeptide consensus sequence Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr ('sequon") where Xaa can be any amino acid except proline (Kornfeld and Kornfeld, 1985; Lis and Sharon, 1993). Furthermore, it is believed that the Ser and Thr hydroxyl side chains are essential determinants of the consensus tripeptide (Bause and Legler, 1981; Ronin et al., 1981; Lehle and Bause, 1983; Kasturi et al., 1995). The tripeptide consensus sequence is regarded as a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for N-glycosylation (Aubert et al., 1981; Gavel and Heijne, 1990). According to our knowledge this concept is in accordance with all examples described so far. Detailed study of the literature reveals only one report concerning the mouse immunoglobulin µ chain where a high-mannose carbohydrate moiety is attached to the asparagine of an illegitimate Asn-Gly-Gly-Thr sequence (Kehry et al., 1979). It is important to note in this context that the N-glycosylation rule was originally deduced from glycoproteins in which the N-glycan is linked via GlcNAc to Asn.
Studies in recent years, however, have revealed the existence of additional N-glycan linkage types. The cell surface glycoprotein of H.halobium contains a total of 12 potential N-glycosylation sites according to the commonly accepted N-glycosylation rule (Lechner and Sumper, 1987). The very first sequon is found at position 2 of the mature polypeptide chain and it is only this site to which the repeating unit saccharide is linked. The linkage unit at this site is GalNAc(1-N)Asn (Paul et al., 1986). With a single exception, all the remaining sequons are linked with sulfated oligosaccharides via the linkage unit Glc([beta]1-N)Asn (Wieland et al., 1983). This prokaryotic glycoprotein offers the unique situation of being equipped with two different types of N-glycosyl bonds. Therefore, as in the case of eukaryotic glycoprotein biosynthesis, additional instructions are required to denote individual glycosylation sites. Most probably, two different saccharyl transferases are involved in the N-glycosylation of the cell surface glycoprotein. Our results indicate that the transferase active at Asn-479, one of the Glc([beta]1-N)Asn sites in the H.halobium glycoprotein, is a conventional N-glycosyltransferase which needs the hydroxyamino acid in the N-glycosylation sequon. In contrast, the transferase catalyzing the N-glycosylation of Asn-2 is not dependent on a hydroxyamino acid that follows the next but one to Asn. Therefore, this enzyme represents a novel type of N-glycosyl-transferase, requiring different sequence motifs for effective N-glycosylation. It would be interesting to know, if there are related N-glycosyltransferases in other organisms. If so, a computer search for N-glycosylation sites may miss a number of glycosylation sites. A Glc([beta]1-N) linkage type was recently found for laminin (Schreiner et al., 1994). Strains
H.halobium (DSM 670) was grown in 'complex medium" as described by Sumper and Herrmann, 1978. Escherichia coli strain DH5[alpha] was used for transformation experiments. Chemicals and enzymes
TPCK-Trypsin was from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany).Mevinolin was extracted from mevinacor® pellets (MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, München) containing 20 mg Lovastatin. Restriction enzymes and enzymes necessary for subcloning and sequencing were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim, Pharmacia (Uppsala), and MBI Fermentas (Vilnius). All other chemicals of analytical grade were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt). Plasmids
pUC8-15 is a vector previously isolated from a halobacterial genomic library in our laboratory (Lechner et al., 1987) containing a 15 kb insert with the complete csg gene and EcoRI flanking sites. pWL-102 is a shuttle vector developed by Lam and Doolittle (1989) that was kindly provided by Dr. F. Pfeifer (TH Darmstadt). Synthesis of oligonucleotides
Following oligonucleotides were synthesized with a Oligo 1000 DNA-synthesizer (Beckmann Instruments, Fullerton, CA). The number of the nucleotide position is related to the first nucleotide of the respective open reading frame. Oligos from the csg gene for the csgX4 mutants
ONG4: 5[prime]GCG GCG AAT GCA gGa GAt CTG AAC GAT TAT CAG (100-132) replacing A112 for G, C114 for A and C117 for T and thereby introducing a new cutting site for BglII; ONV4: 5[prime]GCG GCG AAT GCA gtC GAC CT (100-119) replacing A112 for G and G113 for T and thereby introducing a new cutting site for SalI; ONL4: 5[prime]GCG GCG AAT GCA ttg GAC CTG AAC GAT TAT CAG (100-132) replacing A112 for T, G113 for T and C114 for G and thereby introducing a new cutting site for AvaIII; ONN4: 5[prime]GCG GCG AAT GCA AaC GAt CTG AAC GAT TAT CAG (100-132) replacing G113 for A and C117 for T and thereby introducing a new cutting site for MboI; ONI4: 5[prime]GCG GCG AAT GCA AtC GAt CTG AAC (100-123) replacing G113 for T and C117 for T and thereby introducing a new cutting site for ClaI; ON2: 5[prime]C CAG CTT CCG GAA GGT AAC GT (anti-sense, 236-256). Oligonucleotides from the csg gene for making the csgV481 mutant
ON61: 5[prime]T GAG AAA TCG ATC GAA GTC GA (1395-1415); ON62: 5[prime]ACC Gac CGA GTT aAC GGC GTC GCT CTT (anti-sense, 1522-1548) replacing G1536 for A, A1543 for C and G1544 for A; ON63: 5[prime]GCC GTt AAC TCG gtC GGT GGC GTG (1531-1554) replacing C1536 for T, T1543 for G and C1544 for T and thereby introducing a new cutting site for HpaI; ON64: 5[prime]CTG TCG GAG CTC CGA GAT GTC (anti-sense, 1810-1830).
ON15U2: 5[prime]TTC GAG TCC GGG AGG CGG TTT A; ON3: 5[prime]CCG CAC CTG TGG GTC GCG T (1328-1346) of the HMG-CoA reductase gene responsible for the mevinolin resistance carried by the pWL-102 plasmid as described by Lam and Doolittle (1992). Polymerase chain reaction for generation of mutagenized DNA fragments
Polymerase chain reaction was done in 100 µl containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 200 µM of dNTPs, 100 pmol of each oligonucleotide, varying amounts of template and 2.5 U of Taq-Polymerase with a Perkin-Elmer Cetus Thermal Cycler. Not more than 20 cycles were performed with denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 66°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. Plasmids were used as templates for generating fragments for the mutagenesis vectors. Sequencing of PCR-products
For sequencing of PCR-products, fragments were separated on a preparative agarose gel, electroeluted, treated with T4-DNA-polymerase, phosphorylated and finally ligated into a SmaI and calf intestine phosphatase treated pUC18 vector. Sequencing of the inserts was performed by the dideoxy chain termination method (Sanger et al., 1977) using 35S-labelled [alpha]-thio-dATP (Amersham). Plasmid construction
DNA was cut according to the procedure given by the manufacturer and fragments purified by electroelution. Ligation, transformation, and preparation of plasmid from E.coli strains by the alkaline method was done according to Sambrook et al. (1989). Correct construction of the plasmids was confirmed by restriction analysis. Construction of mutagenized csg genes with an exchange for Ser-4
Respective PCR reactions were performed with the oligonucleotide ONG4, ONV4, ONL4, ONN4, and ONI4, respectively as sense primer together with the antisense primer ON2 covering the Kpn2I cutting site. pUC8-15 containing the complete csg gene (Lechner and Sumper, 1987) served as template. The resulting 156 bp DNA-fragments were cloned into pUC18 vector and sequenced. A 5.0 kb SmaI-fragment derived from pUC8-15 containing the complete csg gene was cloned into pUC18 (pUC18-csg). From pUC18-csg a EcoRI-ApaI fragment was subcloned into pBluescript SK vector (pB-csg). Finally the 156 bp BsmI-Kpn2I fragment was replaced by a mutated fragment resulting in pB-csgG4, pB-csgV4 etc. (commonly denoted pB-csgX4). Substitution of the EcoRI-ApaI fragment of pUC18-csg with that of pB-csgX4 resulted in pUC18-csgX4 containing a 5 kb fragment with the complete csg gene carrying the desired mutation and about 1 kb 5[prime] and 3[prime] flanking regions. Construction of the mutagenesis vector pRZ-csgX4
The shuttle vector pWL-102 (Lam and Doolittle, 1989) carrying the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase gene mediating mevinolin resistance as well as the pHV2 region for autonomous replication in halobacteria and the ampicillin resistance gene for cloning in E.coli cells was used. The 5 kb BamHI-KpnI fragment of pUC18-csgX4 was inserted into the BamHI-KpnI cloning site of pWL-102 resulting in pRZ-csgX4. Correct arrangement of the vector was analyzed by PCR. Construction of the mutagenesis vector pRZ-csgV481
Two recombinant PCR-fragments, generated with ON61/ON62 and ON63/ON64 from pUC8-15, were used as template for amplifying a recombinant DNA-fragment with ON61 and ON64 carrying a codon which replaces Ser-481 for Val-481. This fragment was exchanged for the ClaI (1401)-SacI (1819) fragment of pUC18-csg which was finally used for construction of pRZ-csgV481 using the same procedures as for pRZ-csgX4. Transformation of H.halobium
Transformation of H.halobium was done as described by Cline and Doolittle (1987). Two milliliters of H.halobium cells (absorbance at 578 nm: 0.300 ) were pelleted and resuspended in 180 µl of spheroblasting solution (2 M NaCl, 27 mM KCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.75, 15% sucrose). Spheroblasts were prepared by addition of 20 µl EDTA (pH 8.75) and incubation for at least 15 min at room temperature. Then 2 µg of mutagenesis vector was added. After 5 min, the transformation sample was gently mixed with an equal volume of 60% PEG 600 and incubated for a further 20 min at room temperature. Transformed bacteria were diluted with 1.6 ml basal salt solution (4.3 M NaCl, 80 mM magnesium sulfate, 10 mM trisodium citrate, 27 mM KCl, 1.4 mM calcium chloride, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 15% sucrose) pelleted and resuspended in 2 ml regeneration medium (basal salt solution plus 0.3% yeast extract and 0.5% peptone from Difco). After incubation at 37°C with shaking over night aliquots of the transformed bacteria were plated onto agar plates containing 20 µM mevinolin. Growth of transformants was usually detected after 8 days. At this stage cells were streaked out onto new mevinolin plates and screened for correct vector integration by Southern blot analysis or PCR with subsequent analysis of additional restriction sites. Isolation of recombinants from transformants
Mevinolin resistant transformants were grown at 37°C on plates without mevinolin. Single colonies from these plates were streaked out onto plates with mevinolin as well as onto plates without mevinolin and examined after 3 days. Bacteria unable to grow on mevinolin containing plates were finally subjected to Southern blot analysis or diagnostic restriction analysis to confirm the mutated genotype. Southern blot analysis
Isolation of total halobacterial DNA from 1 ml cultured cells was performed as described previously (Lechner and Sumper, 1987; Sambrook et al., 1989). After electrophoresis on an 1% or 0.6% agarose gel, the DNA was denatured, neutralized, and transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond N from Amersham Life Sciences, Braunschweig) by vacuum blotting using a VacuBlot apparatus (Pharmacia, Uppsala). Transferred DNA was immobilized by UV and hybridized with 35S-labeled DNA fragments. Labeling of the DNA fragments was performed with random hexanucleotide primers and Klenow polymerase (Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983, 1984). Hybridization conditions were as follows: 0.1% SDS, 5× Denhardts solution, 5× SSPE, 50% formamide, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 100 µg of sonified salmon sperm DNA per ml hybridization solution. Prehybridization was done without dithiothreitol for 4 h at 42°C. Subsequently 1 × 105 c.p.m. of the radioactive probe per cm2 membrane were added and hybridization performed at 42°C for 16 h. The filters were washed two times with 0.2× SSC containing 0.1% SDS and incubated with shaking in the same solution for 1 h at 65°C. Analysis of the genotypes by diagnostic restriction analysis
For screening of transformants and mutants with a PCR-based method ON15U2 was used as sense primer. ON15U2 corresponds to a sequence region closely upstream to the SmaI site which is located upstream to the csg gene sequence. As anti-sense primer ON2 was used for csgX4 mutants and ON64 was used for csgV481. PCR (30 cycles) was performed with the respective total genomic DNA. The resulting fragments were precipitated and subjected to digestion with the respective restriction endonucleases. Fragments were finally analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Purification of the N-terminal tryptic peptide
A tryptic glycopeptide fraction of high molecular weight was isolated from a halobacterial cell envelope fraction as described previously (Paul et al. 1986). The cell envelope fraction was incubated twice for 10 h with 2.5% (w/w) N-tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin (Sigma) in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5 containing 5 mM CaCl2. After digestion the sample was passed through a column of AG 50W-X8 H+ ion exchange resin (Bio-Rad) in water. The eluate was concentrated and chromatographed on a Bio-Gel P-10 column. Fractions from the void volume and positive in the phenol-sulfuric acid assay (Dubois et al., 1956 ) were further purified on a reversed phase column (Lichrosorb RP 18, Merck) under the following conditions: a gradient of acetonitrile in 20 mM ammonium acetate was applied from 0 to 100% in 60 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Peaks detected at 226 nm were collected and again tested with an uronic acid detection assay (Blumenkrantz et al., 1973). Determination of total sugar composition
Total sugar composition was determined according to Lechner and Wieland (1992) after methanolysis and pentafluoropropionylation. Derivatized sugars were analyzed on a Finnigan MAT gc-ms apparatus equipped with a DB-1701 capillary column at 1 ml/min He gas flow. Sequencing of peptides
Sequence analysis of peptides was performed by Edman degra-dation using an automated gas-phase peptide sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc.)
LC-MS of tryptic peptides
Wild type CSG and CSGV481 were purified to homogeneity from the respective cell envelope preparations by the phenol extraction method. An aliquot was subjected to trypsin digestion at 37°C for 16 h and separated on a Vydac C18-column (250 mm, 0.8 mm) directly connected to an ES-MS (Finnigan MAT SSQ7000). Simultaneously absorbance at 220 nm was monitored. Eluent A was 0.05% TFA in water and Eluent B was 70% acetonitrile containing 0.05% TFA. After elution of unbound material with 10% B a linear gradient was applied for elution of peptides reaching 100% B in 1 h.
We thank Professor Dr. F. Pfeifer, TH Darmstadt, for providing pWL-102 and PD. Dr. J. Soppa, Max Planck Institut, Martinsried, for help in establishing transformation of halobacteria. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
CSG, cell surface glycoprotein; Glc, glucose; GlcA, glucuronic acid; GalNac, N-acetyl-galactosamine; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ES-MS, electron spray mass spectrometry.
Discussion
Materials and methods
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 19 Dec 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. J. Kelleher and R. Gilmore
An evolving view of the eukaryotic oligosaccharyltransferase
Glycobiology,
April 1, 2006;
16(4):
47R - 62R.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. Eichler and M. W. W. Adams
Posttranslational Protein Modification in Archaea
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
September 1, 2005;
69(3):
393 - 425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Nita-Lazar, M. Wacker, B. Schegg, S. Amber, and M. Aebi
The N-X-S/T consensus sequence is required but not sufficient for bacterial N-linked protein glycosylation
Glycobiology,
April 1, 2005;
15(4):
361 - 367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. Schaffer and P. Messner
Surface-layer glycoproteins: an example for the diversity of bacterial glycosylation with promising impacts on nanobiotechnology
Glycobiology,
August 1, 2004;
14(8):
31R - 42R.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. Eichler
Facing extremes: archaeal surface-layer (glyco)proteins
Microbiology,
December 1, 2003;
149(12):
3347 - 3351.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
R. G. Spiro
Protein glycosylation: nature, distribution, enzymatic formation, and disease implications of glycopeptide bonds
Glycobiology,
April 1, 2002;
12(4):
43R - 56R.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
FREE Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Disclaimer
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Zeitler, R.
![]()
Articles by Sumper, M.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Zeitler, R.
![]()
Articles by Sumper, M.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?