Skip Navigation


Glycobiology Advance Access originally published online on February 17, 2006
Glycobiology 2006 16(6):502-513; doi:10.1093/glycob/cwj093
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/6/502    most recent
cwj093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zaia, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zaia, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A tandem mass spectrometric approach to determination of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate oligosaccharide glycoforms

May Joy C. Miller2, Catherine E. Costello2, Anders Malmström3 and Joseph Zaia1,2

2 Department of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany Street, R-806, Boston, MA 02118; and 3 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Lund University, BMC B11, S-221 84, Lund, Sweden


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; e-mail: jzaia{at}bu.edu

Received on October 27, 2005; revised on January 26, 2006; accepted on February 15, 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Dermatan sulfate (DS) chains are variants of chondroitin sulfate (CS) that are expressed in mammalian extracellular matrices and are particularly prevalent in skin. DS has been implicated in varied biological processes including wound repair, infection, cardiovascular disease, tumorigenesis, and fibrosis. The biological activities of DS have been attributed to its high content of IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) disaccharide units. Mature CS/DS chains consist of blocks with high and low GlcA/IdoA ratios, and sulfation may occur at the 4- and/or 6-position of GalNAc and 2-position of IdoA. Traditional methods for the analysis of CS/DS chains involve differential digestion with specific chondroitinases followed by steps of chromatographic isolation of the products and di-saccharide analysis on the individual fraction. This work reports the use of tandem mass spectrometry to determine the patterns of sulfation and epimerization of CS/DS oligosaccharides in a single step. The approach is first validated and then applied to a series of skin DS samples and to decorins from three different tissues. DS samples ranged from 74 to 99% of CSB-like repeats, using this approach. Decorin samples ranged from 30% CSB-like repeats for those samples from articular cartilage to 75% for those from sclera. These values agree with known levels of glucuronyl C5-epimerase in these tissues.

Key words: chondroitin sulfate / decorin / dermatan sulfate / glycosaminoglycan / mass spectrometry


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) glycoforms are of particular interest because of their varied biological properties. Proteoglycans (PGs)/GAGs are predominantly found on cellular membranes and in the extracellular matrix of mammalian tissues. They interact with numerous proteins, growth factors, and cell surface receptors and thus serve a variety of important roles in cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, migration, and recruitment of neutrophils (Hocking et al., 1998Go; Bernfield et al., 1999Go; Trowbridge and Gallo, 2002Go). GAGs are linear, sulfated polysaccharides that are attached by a linker to a serine residue of the core protein of a proteoglycan; the structures of GAGs bound to a given core protein are known to vary depending on the environment (tissue, developmental disease, or cytokine state) (Faissner et al., 1994Go; Kitagawa et al., 1997Go; Clement et al., 1998Go; Tiedemann et al., 2005Go). The dynamic nature and biological importance of GAG glycoforms drive the need for a rapid and sensitive means of determination of their sulfation and epimerization patterns. Dermatan sulfate (DS) is a chondroitin sulfate (CS) variant that exhibits anticoagulant activity in both animals and humans and has been incorporated into antithrombic therapies (Maimone and Tollefsen, 1990Go; Cofrancesco et al., 1994Go; Di Carlo et al., 1999Go). In contrast to other antithrombic GAGs, DS is effective on both free and fibrin-bound thrombin (Bendayan et al., 1994Go; Liaw et al., 2001Go) and has low hemorrhagic complications (Cofrancesco et al., 1994Go; Di Carlo et al., 1999Go). Scleral proteoglycans interact via their DS chains, demonstrating the multifaceted potentials of GAGs in promoting multifaceted binding with other macromolecules (Fransson et al., 1982Go).

DS interactions with fibroblast growth factors FGF-2 (Penc et al., 1998Go) and FGF-7 (Trowbridge et al., 2002Go) have been shown with respect to cellular proliferation and wound repair, respectively. Interactions with hepatic growth factor/scatter factor establish that DS plays roles in tumorigenesis and metastasis (Lyon et al., 2002Go). Oversulfated DS chains play roles in promoting neurite outgrowth in embryonic brain (Hikino et al., 2003Go). Decorin, a DS-containing proteoglycan predominant in skin, acts as an inflammation regulator through interaction with C1q (Krumdieck et al., 1992Go) and transforming growth factor-beta (Yamaguchi et al., 1990Go) and may play an important role in the inflammatory process of Lyme disease (Guo et al., 1995Go).

Although the IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) disaccharide unit is the most highly expressed in mammalian DS, analyses of several preparations reveal heterogeneity within the polysaccharide chain (Poblacion and Michelacci, 1986Go). This is due to the biosynthetic modifying reactions that generate DS from nascent chondroitin chains of composition [GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc(ß1–4)]n after the initial polymerization; epimerization of GlcA to IdoA occurs before sulfation (Malmstrom and Aberg, 1982Go; Malmstrom, 1984Go). Mammalian DS consists of domains of high percentage of IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) and those with high GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4). Variable quantities of GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) are also present (Poblacion and Michelacci, 1986Go). DS chains from the body of an ascidian Ascidia nigra have a repeat unit of IdoA2S({alpha}1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) (Pavao et al., 1995Go) and lack the anticoagulant activity of 4-sulfated DS (Vicente et al., 2001Go). Monoclonal antibodies generated against Ascidia DS have demonstrated the presence of IdoA2S({alpha}1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) repeats in mouse brain (Bao et al., 2005Go).

Because the ability of GAGs to bind protein receptors largely depends on their structure, the number of disaccharide repeats (size), and sulfation pattern, analytical techniques to determine GAG fine structure are highly valuable. Total uronic acid content for GAG preparations may be determined using the carbazole reaction (Meyer and Rapport, 1950Go; Rapport et al., 1951Go; Bitter and Muir, 1962Go). Chemical measurement of IdoA and GlcA content entails reaction of uronate carboxyl groups with a carbodiimide, followed by reduction and acid hydrolysis. The monosaccharide products, differing for GlcA and IdoA, are then per-O-benzoylated, separated, and quantified using chromatography (Karamanos et al., 1988Go). The IdoA content of CS/DS chains may be determined by differential chondroitinase digestion followed by chromatographic separation (Coster et al., 1975Go). The differential chondroitinase digestion approach has been used in conjunction with subsequent size-exclusion chromatography (Malmstrom and Fransson, 1975Go), reversed-phase ion pairing high-performance liquid chromatography (RPIP-HPLC) (Karamanos et al., 1988Go), or slab gel electrophoresis (Fransson et al., 1990Go; Cheng et al., 1994Go). Oligosaccharide products of chondroitinase reactions isolated by RPIP-HPLC or other techniques may be subjected to additional chemical or enzymatic degradative steps (Theocharis et al., 2001Go) followed by monosaccharide or disaccharide analysis. Highly sensitive chromatographic (Toyoda et al., 1999Go, 2000Go), capillary electrophoretic (Karamanos et al., 1995Go; Mitropoulou et al., 2001Go; Lamari et al., 2002Go), fluorescence-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (Calabro, Benavides, et al., 2000Go; Calabro, Hascall, et al., 2000Go), and mass spectrometric (Desaire and Leary, 2000Go) methods are available for CS/DS disaccharide analysis. To determine uronic acid epimers from disaccharide analysis, one may use a chemical degradation method. The intact GAG chains are deacetylated by hydrazinolysis and subjected to deaminative cleavage using nitrous acid at pH 4. The resulting disaccharides, each containing dehydromannose at the reducing end and an unmodified uronic acid residue, may be reduced with sodium borotritide or tagged with a chromophore or fluorophore before chromographic or electrophoretic separation (Guo and Conrad, 1989Go).

Measurement of the mass of a CS/DS oligosaccharide determines the composition with respect to the number of uronic acid, N-acetylhexosamine, and sulfate units (Carr and Reinhold, 1984Go; Takagaki et al., 1992Go; Sugahara et al., 1994Go). Tandem mass spectrometry (MS) determines the number of sulfate groups per disaccharide unit and provides a measure of IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) content in the target oligosaccharide (Zaia et al., 2001Go, 2003Go) based on product ion abundances.

We have used a liquid chromatography (LC)–MS platform for determining CS/DS glycoform distribution (Hitchcock et al., 2006). The present work describes the principles behind this approach and extends the analysis to longer oligosaccharides. A series of dermal DS samples isolated under different conditions are analyzed, in addition to a series of decorins from different tissues. The CS/DS chains are partially depolymerized using chondroitinase ABC and the resultant oligosaccharides analyzed using tandem MS. This approach is used to compare the expression of oligosaccharide glycoforms among the different samples. Such comparisons would be significantly more laborious using traditional techniques. These experiments demonstrate the principle and validity of a new method for glycoform analysis of CS/DS chains, one that will be useful in the emerging field of glycomics.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Partial depolymerization of CS/DS samples
Oligosaccharides were generated from CS/DS samples by stopping chondroitinase ABC digestions at a time point found to produce 232 nm absorbance of 30% of its maximum value (see Materials and methods for details). The oligosaccharides were fractionated using high-performance size-exclusion chromatography with 232 nm detection. Oligosaccharide length will be given as degree of polymerization (dp) and the number of monosaccharide units. Peak area percentages for dp2, dp4, and dp6 for each of the samples are summarized in Table I. The size-exclusion chromatograms displayed no defined peaks greater than dp6, and the 232-nm baseline was elevated before the elution of this oligomer. Thus, the reported values include the area of this baseline elevation, listed as ">dp6."


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Relative chromatographic peak areas for CS/DS samples partially digested with chondroitinase ABC

 

MS of CS/DS oligosaccharides
The compositions of oligosaccharides with a 4,5-unsaturated uronic acid residue at the nonreducing end will be given preceded with the {Delta} symbol. Figure 1 is a representative electrospray (ESI) mass spectrum of size-exclusion chromatography fractions corresponding to dp4 (A) and dp6 (B). The ion at m/z 458 corresponds to [M-2H]2– for {Delta}dp4 (A) and [M-3H]3– for {Delta}dp6 (B). Because this ion is isobaric for {Delta}-unsaturated CS/DS oligosaccharides of composition {Delta}(HexA)n(GalNAc)n(SO3)n, careful isolation of the individual oligomers was performed using high-performance size-exclusion chromatography. The isotope pattern of the ion at m/z 458 (Figure 1A, inset) shows peaks separated by 0.50 µ that signify a charge state of 2, the neutral mass of which (918.10 Da; Table II) matches a composition of {Delta}(HexA)2(GalNAc)2(SO3)2. The inset in Figure 1B shows peaks separated by 0.33 µ, signifying a charge state of 3, the neutral mass of which (1377.24 Da; Table II) is consistent with a composition of {Delta}(HexA)3(GalNAc)3(SO3)3. The absence of an ion at m/z 458.38 from Figure 1A shows that the dp4 fraction is not contaminated with dp6. The absence of an ion at m/z 458.55 from Figure 1B shows that there is no dp4 in the dp6 fraction. These negative electrospray ionization patterns produced from CS/DS oligosaccharides are consistent with the previous reports (Desaire and Leary, 2000Go; Zaia and Costello, 2001Go; Zaia et al., 2001Go, 2003Go; Chai et al., 2002Go; Zamfir et al., 2003Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Representative ESI mass spectra of partially depolymerized and purified CS/DS size-exclusion chromatography fractions in the negative mode, (A) the spectrum obtained from the dp4 fraction and (B) that from the dp6 fraction.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Mass spectral ion assignments for CS/DS {Delta}dp4 and {Delta}dp6 oligosaccharides

 

Assignments for all ions observed in the mass spectra of CS/DS dp4 and dp6 fractions are listed in Table II. The ions at m/z 498 in Figure 1A correspond to {Delta}(HexA)2 (GalNAc)2(SO3)3 and m/z 484 in Figure 1B to {Delta}(HexA)3 (GalNAc)3(SO3)4 (Table II). These CS/DS oligosaccharides contain more than one sulfate group per disaccharide repeat and are termed oversulfated. In addition, an [M-2H]2– ion corresponding to a saturated oligosaccharide of composition of (HexA)3(GalNAc)3(SO3)3 was detected at m/z 696.5 in Figure 1B. This composition matches that expected for an oligosaccharide derived from the nonreducing terminus of the intact CS/DS chain, by virtue of the fact that the neutral mass is consistent with a saturated structure. The ion at m/z 464 in Figure 1B corresponds to [M-3H]3– for the same composition. The ion at m/z 899 in Figure 1B corresponds to the composition [{Delta}(HexA)2(GalNAc)2(SO3)2–H2O] (Table II). Gentle ionization conditions were used, and no losses of SO3 or other signs of in-source fragmentation were observed in Figure 1. It is therefore likely that the species giving rise to m/z 899 exists in solution and is not an artifact of the MS measurement. Although the oligosaccharide composition may be determined from the molecular weight information obtained from the ESI mass spectra, detailed structural information such as sulfation positions and epimerization state is not produced.

Tandem MS of CS/DS {Delta}dp4 glycoforms
To determine positions of sulfation and epimerization, we compared abundances of the fragment ions formed from DS oligosaccharides with those produced from commercial CS/DS standards with known epimerization and GalNAc sulfate positions. It was established previously that tandem MS product ion abundances of CS oligosaccharides reflect sulfation position at GalNAc residues (Zaia et al., 2001Go; McClellan et al., 2002Go) and epimerization of HexA residues (Zaia et al., 2003Go). Thus, three commercial standards were used, each of which is ~90% pure. These were CSA (GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4))n, CSB (IdoA({alpha}1–3)Gal NAc4S(ß1–4))n, and CSC (GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4))n. Furthermore, to focus the analysis on a single uronic acid that is unaltered by lyase digestion, we first investigated {Delta}dp4 series.

Figure 2 shows the tandem mass spectra of {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides generated from CS standard preparations, CSA (Figure 2A), CSB (Figure 2B), and CSC (Figure 2C). The doubly charged precursor ion is typically present as the most abundant charge state, and product ions resulting from glycosidic bond cleavages are abundant, whereas those from losses of SO3 are in low abundance. Although the three CS/DS {Delta}dp4 isomers dissociate to form ions with identical m/z values, differences in abundances of the fragment ions characterize each other. Specifically, there are six signature ions, the abundances of which differentiate the three isomers. The {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides derived from CSA are characterized by high abundance of Y11– (m/z 300) and B31– (m/z 616) ions relative to those observed for the other two isomers (Figure 2A). CSB {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides are characterized by the high abundance of 0,2X32– (m/z 400) and Y32– (m/z 379) ions relative to the other two isomers. Abundant [M-SO3]2– (m/z 418) and C32– (m/z 316) ions characterize CSC {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides. These fragment ions are summarized in Table III. In low-energy collision-induced dissociation (CID) experiments, product ion abundances reflect the lability of the covalent bonds that are cleaved during the tandem MS dissociation. Thus, the sulfation and epimerization positions influence the lability of certain bonds in the oligosaccharide ions that are reflected by the observed ion abundances.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Tandem mass spectra of {Delta}-unsaturated dp4 derived from CSA (A), CSB (B), and CSC (C). The structure of {Delta}-unsaturated dp4 from CSA is shown in (D) with product ion assignments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Tandem mass spectrometric signature ions for CS/DS {Delta}dp4 and {Delta}dp6 oligosaccharides

 

The Y11– ion contains the sulfate group on the reducing terminal GalNAc residue of the precursor oligosaccharide ion. Abundance of this ion correlates directly with the presence of an oligosaccharide with a CSA-like GlcA(ß1–3) GalNAc4S(ß1–4) repeat. Similarly, the B31– ion, which contains the internal sulfated GalNAc residue, is produced by cleavage of the same glycosidic bond, and its abundance correlates with the presence of the same repeat. It is likely that the abundance of both the Y11– and the B31– ions reflect the position of sulfation on the reducing end GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc4S disaccharide. The [M-2H]2– ion of {Delta}dp4 derived from CSC dissociates to produce abundant [M-SO3]2– and C32– ions. The C32– ion contains the internal sulfated GalNAc residue, but the ion abundance of the glycosidic bond cleavage could be influenced by the sulfate position of the reducing end GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S disaccharide during the CID process. Loss of sulfate, [M-SO3]2–, is nonspecific as to the originating GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S disaccharide but is indicative of CSC-like structures. The 0,2X32– and Y32– ion abundances are enhanced when CSB-like IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) repeats are present.

Standards for {Delta}dp4 and {Delta}dp6 oligosaccharides containing mixed GalNAc 4- and 6-sulfation patterns are not available. However, for {Delta}dp4, the abundances of the CSA signature ions, Y11– and B31–, reflect the position of sulfation of the reducing end GalNAc residue. It is therefore likely that all tetrasaccharides with GalNAc-4-sulfate on the reducing end will produce abundant CSA-like signature ions. CSC-like signature ions correspond to C32– and [M-SO3]2–. The abundance of the C32– ion varies according to the position of sulfation of the reducing terminal GalNAc residue and that of the [M-SO3]2– ion varies according to the presence of GalNAc-6-sulfate at either position in the tetramer. Thus, it would be expected that a mixed tetramer with GalNAc-6-sulfate on the reducing end would produce an abundant C32– ion, but that of the [M-SO3]2– ion would be intermediate.

Signature ion patterns
The use of signature ions to distinguish the three CS isomeric oligosaccharides can best be seen when their percent total ion abundances (Table IV) are plotted. The Y11– and B31– ions are most abundant, expressed as a percent of the sum of all product ion abundances (Figure 3A), for CSA {Delta}dp4. The Y32– and 0,2X32– ions are most abundant for {Delta}dp4 derived from CSB. The C32– and [M-SO3]2– ions are most abundant for {Delta}dp4 derived from CSC. The data are replotted in Figure 3B to show how each CS type produces a characteristic pattern of these diagnostic fragment ions. Thus, a given CS sample produces a pattern that is a linear combination of CSA-, CSB-, and CSC-like signature ions. These ions will be used to characterize oligosaccharides derived from CS/DS samples of biological interest, as discussed in the Analysis of varied DS samples and decorin section.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Percent total ion abundances for signature ions for {Delta}dp4 derived from CSA, CSB, and CSC

 

Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Signature ion patterns for {Delta}-unsaturated dp4 derived from standard preparations of CSA, CSB, and CSC. The abundances of selected product ions are compared in (A). The data are replotted in (B) to show how the ion abundances vary according to the type of CS from which the {Delta}-unsaturated dp4 was derived.

 

Tandem MS of CS/DS {Delta}dp6 glycoforms
As with the CS/DS {Delta}dp4, signature ions characterize the {Delta}dp6 oligosaccharides derived from standard CSA, CSB, and CSC. A summary of these ions is provided in Table III. The percent total ion abundances for the Y11– (m/z 300) and B52– (m/z 537) ions are highest for CSA-derived {Delta}dp6 oligosaccharides (Figure 4A). Although these ions are abundant for {Delta}dp6 oligosaccharides derived from CSC, the abundance as a percent of the total is higher for {Delta}dp6 derived from CSA because of the lower abundances of other product ions. The 0,2X53– (m/z 419) and Y53– (m/z 405) ions have the highest percent total ion abundances for {Delta}dp6 derived from CSB (Figure 4B), whereas [M-SO3]3– (m/z 431) and C52– (m/z 546) ions are observed in greatest abundance for those from CSC (Figure 4C). Figure 5A shows how the abundances of the signature ions vary for different types of CS. The data are replotted in Figure 5B to show how the different forms of CS {Delta}dp6 produce characteristic ion patterns.


Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Tandem mass spectra of the {Delta}-unsaturated dp6 derived from standard preparations of CSA (A), CSB (B), and CSC (C). The fragment ion assignments are shown in (D) for {Delta}-unsaturated dp6 derived from CSA.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Signature ion patterns for {Delta}-unsaturated dp6 derived from standard preparations of CSA, CSB, and CSC. The abundances of selected product ions are compared in (A). The data are replotted in (B) to show how the ion abundances vary according to the type of CS from which the {Delta}-unsaturated dp6 was derived.

 

Analysis of varied DS samples and decorin
To demonstrate the utility of this method, we analyzed several CS/DS samples, the {Delta}dp4 signature ion profiles of which are shown in Figure 6. The CS6 sample was purified from horse nasal septum and several DS preparations, namely DS18, DS36, and DS50 were purified from pigskin. From the signature ion patterns, it can easily be confirmed that {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides derived from DS18, DS36, and DS50 display signature ion patterns similar to those of standard CSB. This indicates that a high percentage of the {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides in each of these samples contain the IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) sequence. Those from CS6, by contrast, display signature ion patterns consistent with a high percentage of GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) repeats. Although the signature ion patterns of these samples qualitatively resemble those of the standards, the heights of the bars differ. For instance, samples DS18, DS36, and DS50 show an apparent increase in the height of CSA-like ions, suggesting varying GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) content of DS18, DS36, and DS50. Also, the middle bar, which represents CSB-like ions, decreases from DS18 to DS50, which reflects the decreasing IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) content in the DS samples. However, the CSC-like signature ions are observed consistently in low abundances among the DS samples, indicating a minimal content of GlcA(ß1–3) GalNAc6S(ß1–4)repeats. CS6 {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides have significantly more abundant CSC-like signature ions than do those derived from the commercial CSC standard, suggesting that they contain a higher percentage of GlcA(ß1–3) GalNAc6S(ß1–4) repeats.


Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Signature ion profile for {Delta}-unsaturated dp4 oligosaccharides derived from CS and DS samples. CS6 is from horse nasal septum. DS18, DS36, and DS50 are from pigskin.

 

The signature ion pattern for the decorin samples is shown in Figure 7. All three decorins tested—bovine articular cartilage decorin (ACD), human cervix decorin (CD), and bovine sclera decorin (SD)—exhibit a CSB-like signature ion pattern, consistent with a high content of IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4) in the {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides generated therefrom. A decreasing CSA-like signature ion contribution is indicated, proceeding from ACD to CD to SD, which again suggests that the content of GlcA(ß1–3) GalNAc4S(ß1–4) sequences varies among {Delta}dp4 generated from the three decorins. Moreover, the CSB-like ions increase from ACD to CD to SD, suggesting that {Delta}dp4 generated from SD has the greatest IdoA({alpha}1–3) GalNAc4S(ß1–4) content of the three decorins. However, the CSC-like ions have the greatest contribution for ACD compared with almost insignificant contribution for CD and SD, suggesting that ACD contains the greatest GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) percentage among the three decorins. For the {Delta}dp6 series, the signature ion profile of DS samples and decorin is similar to that of the {Delta}dp4 series.


Figure 7
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Signature ion profile for {Delta}-unsaturated dp4 oligosaccharides derived from decorin samples: articular cartilage decorin (ACD), human cervix decorin (CD), and bovine sclera decorin (SD).

 

Quantitative analysis of each isomeric contribution
As was pointed out earlier, the signature ion abundances vary directly with the abundances of CSA-, CSB-, and CSC-like disaccharide repeats in each sample. Because the signature ion abundances for a given sample are a linear combination of the three repeat types, the percentages of CSA-, CSB-, and CSC-like ions required to produce the observed patterns can be calculated. Tandem MS ion abundances have been used to quantitate CS and heparin disaccharides (Desaire and Leary, 2000Go; Saad and Leary, 2003Go). Using similar principles applied to the {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharide signature ion abundances, the following equations were applied to calculate the percent contribution of CSA, CSB, and CSC:


Formula



Formula

and


Formula

where Y1, Y3, and M-SO3 are the signature ions for CSA-, CSB-, and CSC-like, respectively; A, B, and C are the unknown contributions of CSA, CSB, and CSC isomers; and D is the contribution from the unknown sample. The percent total ion abundance of each signature ion from the standards is substituted on the left side of the equations and those from the sample on the right side, producing three equations with three unknowns. A summary of the calculated percent CSA, CSB, and CSC for DS18, DS36, and DS50 is provided in Table V. The percent of CSA-like sequences (GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4)) is observed to increase, from DS18 to DS36 to DS50, and that for CSB (IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc4S(ß1–4)) to decrease. The absence of CSC-like sequences (GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4)) is observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Percent compositions for glycoforms of CS/DS {Delta}dp4, calculated from tandem mass spectrometric signature ion abundances

 

Although the level of CSC-like sequences for the CSC {Delta}dp4 oligosaccharides in Table V is 58.18%, the level of {Delta}HexAGalNAc6S disaccharides in Table VI is 78.88%. The mass spectral method compares ion signatures for a given sample against those of the standard CS preparations. The method thus serves as a means of comparing a series of samples but does not provide absolute quantification of the levels CS repeats. The CSC sample contains significantly lower content of {Delta}HexAGalNAc6S (78.88%) than CS6 (93.97%). CS6 is therefore used as a mass spectral standard against which CSC is compared. It is important to emphasize that the trend is the same for the two sets of data. Measurement of relative changes of glycoform expression between a given sample and the CS standards is the most appropriate use of the mass spectral method.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VI. CE-LIF percentage compositions of {Delta}HexAGalNAc4S, {Delta}HexAGalNAc6S, {Delta}HexA2SGalNAc4S, and {Delta}HexA2SGalNAc6S after an exhaustive digestion of the whole DS polymer chain

 

Disaccharide analysis
Disaccharide analysis of CS/DS standards and unknown samples was achieved by exhaustive digestion using chondroitinase ABC, subsequent fluorescent derivatization using 2-aminoacridone (AMAC) and capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence (CE-LIF) detection to analyze the disaccharides (Militsopoulou et al., 2002Go). Migration times of {Delta}-disaccharides generated from standard CS preparations CSA, CSB, CSC, and those from DS samples and decorin were verified against those of AMAC-derivatized commercial disaccharide standards. An AMAC-derivatized trisulfated disaccharide derived from heparin (HSIS) was used as an internal standard for each run, as it has a unique migration time compared with the CS/DS samples analyzed. Tables VI and VII list the {Delta}–disaccharide composition of the whole polymer chain and the dp6 fraction, respectively. Percentage {Delta}-disaccharide compositions were calculated using the CE fluorescence peak areas, normalized to the area of the internal standard.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VII. CE-LIF percent compositions of CS/DS dp6 fraction after an exhaustive digestion using chondroitinase ABC

 
Partial chondroitinase ABC digestion was used to produce oligosaccharide mixtures for subsequent mass spectral analysis. Although the distribution of oligosaccharides was dependent to some extent on the sample, the dp4 and dp6 fractions are representative of the glycoform distribution of the entire CS/DS chain. This can be seen from the good agreement in disaccharide analysis values obtained from isolated dp6 fractions versus those of the entire CS/DS chain from which they were derived (Tables VI and VII).

For the GlcA-containing standards, CSA is shown to contain 94.65% {Delta}HexA-GalNAc4S and 5.34% {Delta}HexA-GalNAc6S, whereas CSC is a mixture of 17.45% {Delta}HexA-GalNAc4S, 78.88% {Delta}HexAGalNAc6S, and 3.66% of the 2-sulfated disaccharide, {Delta}HexA2SGalNAc6S (Table VI). The CS6 sample contains 93.97% {Delta}HexAGalNAc6S, significantly greater than the value observed for the commercial CSC, a trend that was observed in the signature ion plots for the {Delta}dp4 and {Delta}dp6 oligosaccharides (Figure 6). Thus, the higher abundance of GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) in CS6 compared with that in the CSC standard from the MS ion signature data is supported by the CE-based {Delta}-disaccharide analyses of the abundances of the {Delta}HexAGalNAc6S disaccharides. Likewise, lower abundances of GlcA(ß1–3) GalNAc4S(ß1–4) signature ions in CS6 relative to commercial CSC is reflected by the lower percentage of {Delta}HexAGalNAc4S in the CE-LIF data.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The use of MS ion signatures to quantify CSA-, CSB-, and CSC-like repeats in CS/DS oligosaccharides allows the comparison of sulfation pattern and epimerization state among samples derived from different tissue contexts or purification schemes. Because the mass spectral ion signatures of each are measured against the same standard CS/DS preparations, it is possible to compare glycoform distributions among a series of GAG or PG samples derived from different environments. The method entails digestion with a single nonspecific enzyme, a single stage of chromatography followed by mass spectral analysis. We have also used this approach in an LC–tandem MS platform (Hitchcock et al., in press). This platform is limited to the analysis of tetrasaccharides, and the present work extends the analysis to hexasaccharides.

Decorins with GAG chains containing high DS content have been shown to be expressed in articular cartilage (Rosenberg et al., 1985Go; Sampaio et al., 1988Go; Cheng et al., 1994Go). The activity of D-glucuronyl C5-epimerase is high in fibroblasts, intermediate in articular cartilage, and low in nasal cartilage (Tiedemann et al., 2001Go); the results of this work (Table V), showing that levels of CSB-like repeats are generally higher for the dermal DS than for articular cartilage decorins, are consistent with this trend in enzyme activities. The results for all decorin samples tested indicate significant abundances of CSB-like (IdoA({alpha}1–3)Gal NAc4S(ß1–4)) repeats from 31.1 to 74.5% (Table V).

Dermal DS samples show a consistent decrease in total CSB-like repeats, from DS18 to DS50. DS chains are purified from skin, and the associated numeral refers to the percent ethanol at which the chains precipitated (Davidson et al., 1956Go; Fransson and Roden, 1967aGo). Previous reports have indicated that DS samples contain high levels of IdoA-GalNAc4S repeats (Hoffman et al., 1957Go; Fransson and Roden, 1967bGo), with lower levels of IdoA2S-Gal NAc4S (Coster et al., 1975Go) and GlcA(ß1–3) Gal NAc6S(ß1–4) repeats (Fransson, 1968Go). The disaccharide analysis of the present DS samples shows that {Delta}HexAGalNAc4S comprises 84.1–95.5% of the disaccharides formed by chondroitinase ABC digestion but that a significant percentage of {Delta}HexAGalNAc6S is also detected (Table VI). The MS ion signatures indicate that 74.3–99.1% of the oligosaccharides have CSB-like IdoA({alpha}1–3)-Gal NAc4S(ß1–4) character (Table V, column 2) and that CSC-like GlcA(ß1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) repeats are not detected.

It must be emphasized that the MS measurements determine the degree of similarity of oligosaccharides from an unknown sample with those from standard CS/DS preparations. Thus, each unknown sample is compared against the same standard compounds and, by extrapolation, to other unknowns. Because only CSA, CSB, and CSC were used as standards, it remains possible that low levels of other glycoforms present in the samples remain undetected. For instance, low levels of IdoA({alpha}1–3)GalNAc6S(ß1–4) repeats, known to be present in mammalian tissue (Bao et al., 2005Go), are possibly detected as CSB-like ions. Although it has 6-sulfation, MS detects the signature ion for epimerization more than the sulfation position. At this juncture, this proposal remains to be proven until IdoA({alpha}1–3)Gal NAc6S(ß1–4) standard becomes available. Moreover, oligosaccharides containing both 6- and 4-sulfation on the same chain would also need an appropriate standard to accurately identify and quantify them.

Glycans released from biological sources are typically complex mixtures of glycoforms. Because the purification is difficult and time consuming, methods are needed to characterize mixtures directly. By determining the compositions of glycoforms, it is possible to profile expressed glycans as a function of changes to the biological context. The present work applies tandem MS analysis to CS/DS glycoforms. Using this method, product ion profiles obtained from unknown CS/DS samples, consisting of mixtures of glycoforms, are compared against those obtained from purified standard preparations. Thus, the degree of similarity of the CS/DS oligosaccharides to the standards is quantified. In this manner, information on sulfation position and uronic acid epimerization is produced in a single measurement. In future work, these concepts will be developed into an LC/MS platform for glycomics profiling so as to streamline the workflow. Thus, partially depolymerized CS/DS oligosaccharides will be separated using high-performance size-exclusion chromatography with online tandem MS detection. In principle, the concept demonstrated for CS/DS oligosaccharides should be applicable to any class of glycans. The nature of the separation system will change depending on the chemistry of the glycan class in question, and the structural detail produced will depend on the nature of the standards against which unknown glycoconjugate samples are compared.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
CS type A (GlcA, GalNAc4S), CSB (IdoA, GalNAc4S), CSC (GlcA, GalNAc6S), and chondroitinase ABC were obtained from Seikagaku America/Associates of Cape Cod (Falmouth, MA). Purified CS {Delta}-disaccharide standards were purchased from V-Labs (Covington, LA). Bovine articular cartilage decorin was purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). DS samples were prepared by precipitation from calcium acetate/acetic acid solution with ethanol. AMAC was purchased from Fluka Chemical (Milwaukee, WI), sodium cyanoborohydride was from Aldrich Chemical (Milwaukee, WI), and cellulose spin columns were purchased from Harvard Apparatus (Holliston, MA).

Partial digestion of chondroitin and dermatan sulfate
The method for digestion was described previously (Zaia et al., 2003Go). Briefly, 100 µg of CS/DS was mixed with 10 µL of water, 2 µL of 1 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.4), 1 µL of 1 M NH4OAc, and 4 mU of chondroitinase ABC and was digested at 37°C. After 8 min (30% digestion), the digestion was terminated by boiling for 2 min. Oligosaccharides were fractionated using a Superdex Peptide 3.2/30 column (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), which was equilibrated in 10% aceteonitrile, 0.1 M ammonium acetate at 100 µL/min, with detection at 232 nm.

Electrospray MS
Mass spectra were acquired in the negative mode using an Applied Biosystems/MDS-Sciex (Toronto, Canada) API QSTAR Pulsar i quadrupole orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometer fitted with a nanospray ion source. Samples were dissolved in 10% isopropanol and diluted with 10% isopropanol and 0.1% NH4OH to achieve a 1–5 pmol/µL solution. Aliquots of 5 µL were sprayed into the mass spectrometer using 1 µm orifice nanospray tips pulled in-house using a capillary puller (Sutter Instrument P 80/PC micropipette puller; San Rafael, CA). An ionization potential of –1150 V produced a steady ion signal, and all spectra were calibrated externally. The collision energies were set so that the precursor ion remained the most abundant. For CID, these were best obtained at collision energy of –18 and –16 V for the {Delta}dp4 and {Delta}dp6 series, respectively.

Exhaustive digestion of CS/DS
To 100 µg of CS/DS was mixed 10 µL of water, 2 µL of 1 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.4), 1 µL of 1 M NH4OAc, and 20 mU of chondroitinase ABC, and digestion was allowed to proceed at 37°C. After 12 h, an additional 20 mU of chondroitinase ABC was added. The mixture was allowed to digest for 24 h after which the reaction was stopped by boiling the mixture for 2 min. The disaccharide collected after size-exclusion chromatography was derivatized with AMAC.

AMAC derivatization
Derivatization with AMAC was performed following the procedure described by Militsopoulou (Militsopoulou et al., 2002Go). To the lyophilized disaccharide CS/DS (at least 100 pmol) was added 5 µL of 0.1 M AMAC solution in acetic acid : dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (3:17, v/v) and 5 µL of a freshly prepared 1 M NaBH3CN solution in water. The mixture was vortexed for 3 min and was incubated at 45°C for 4 h after which 50 µL of DMSO was added. Excess reagent was removed using cellulose spin columns.

CE analysis
The AMAC-derivatized DS samples were analyzed using a Beckman Coulter (Fullerton, CA) P/ACE MDQ capillary electrophoresis instrument. The uncoated, fused silica capillary tube (75 µm ID, 60 cm total length) was regenerated with 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH, and HPLC grade water before each run, and analyses were performed using 50 mM NaH2PO4 buffer, pH 3.5, at 30 kV at reverse polarity and detection using the AMAC chromophore at 254 nm. Distinct separation of the CS/DS isomers was obtained in the reverse polarity, and reproducibility was also obtained when fresh buffer solution was used for each run. An HSIS was used as an internal standard for each run, as it has a unique migration time compared with the CS/DS samples.


    Conflict of interest statement
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
None declared.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This work was supported by NIH grants P41RR10888 and R01HL74197.


    Abbreviations
 
ACD, bovine articular cartilage decorin; AMAC, 2-aminoacridone; CD, human cervix decorin; CE, capillary electrophoresis; CID, collision-induced dissociation; CS, chondroitin sulfate; CSA, chondroitin sulfate type A; CSB, chondroitin sulfate type B; CSC, chondroitin sulfate type C; dp, degree of polymerization; DS, dermatan sulfate; ESI, electrospray; FGF, fibroblastic growth factor; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; HSIS, AMAC-derivatized trisulfated disaccharide derived from heparin; LC, liquid chromatography; LIF, laser-induced fluorescence; MS, mass spectrometry; PG, proteoglycan; RPIP-HPLC, reversed-phase ion pairing high-performance liquid chromatography; SD, bovine sclera decorin; {Delta}, 4,5-unsaturated uronic acid


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 Conflict of interest statement
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Bao, X., Pavao, M.S., Dos Santos, J.C., and Sugahara, K. (2005) A functional dermatan sulfate epitope containing iduronate(2-O-sulfate) alpha1-3GalNAc(6-O-sulfate) disaccharide in the mouse brain: demonstration using a novel monoclonal antibody raised against dermatan sulfate of ascidian Ascidia nigra. J. Biol. Chem., 280, 23184–23193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bendayan, P., Boccalon, H., Dupouy, D., and Boneu, B. (1994) Dermatan sulfate is a more potent inhibitor of clot-bound thrombin than unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins. Thromb. Haemost., 71, 576–580.[Medline]

Bernfield, M., Gotte, M., Park, P.W., Reizes, O., Fitzgerald, M.L., Lincecum, J., and Zako, M. (1999) Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 68, 729–777.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bitter, T. and Muir, H.M. (1962) A modified uronic acid carbazole reaction. Anal. Biochem., 4, 330–334.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Calabro, A., Benavides, M., Tammi, M., Hascall, V.C., and Midura, R.J. (2000) Microanalysis of enzyme digests of hyaluronan and chondroitin/dermatan sulfate by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE). Glycobiology, 10, 273–281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Calabro, A., Hascall, V.C., and Midura, R.J. (2000) Adaptation of FACE methodology for microanalysis of total hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate composition from cartilage. Glycobiology, 10, 283–293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carr, S.A. and Reinhold, V.N. (1984) Structural characterization of sulfated glycosaminoglycans by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry: application to chondroitin sulfate. J. Carbohydr. Chem., 3, 381–401.

Chai, W., Beeson, J.G., and Lawson, A.M. (2002) The structural motif in chondroitin sulfate for adhesion of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes comprises disaccharide units of 4-O-sulfated and non-sulfated N-acetylgalactosamine linked to glucuronic acid. J. Biol. Chem., 277, 22438–22446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheng, F., Heinegard, D., Malmstrom, A., Schmidtchen, A., Yoshida, K., and Fransson, L.A. (1994) Patterns of uronosyl epimerization and 4-/6-O-sulphation in chondroitin/dermatan sulphate from decorin and biglycan of various bovine tissues. Glycobiology, 4, 685–696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clement, A.M., Nadanaka, S., Masayama, K., Mandl, C., Sugahara, K., and Faissner, A. (1998) The DSD-1 carbohydrate epitope depends on sulfation, correlates with chondroitin sulfate D motifs, and is sufficient to promote neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 28444–28453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cofrancesco, E., Boschetti, C., Leonardi, P., Gianese, F., and Cortellaro, M. (1994) Dermatan sulphate for the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in acute leukemia: a randomised, heparin-controlled pilot study. Thromb. Res., 74, 65–75.[Medline]

Coster, L., Malmstrom, A., Sjoberg, I., and Fransson, L. (1975) The co-polymeric structure of pig skin dermatan sulphate. Distribution of L-iduronic acid sulphate residues in co-polymeric chains. Biochem. J., 145, 379–389.[Medline]

Davidson, E., Hoffman, P., Linker, A., and Meyer, K. (1956) The acid mucopolysaccharides of connective tissue. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 21, 506–518.[Medline]

Desaire, H. and Leary, J.A. (2000) Detection and quantification of the sulfated disaccharides in chondroitin sulfate by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 11, 916–920.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Di Carlo, V., Agnelli, G., Prandoni, P., Coccheri, S., Gensini, G.F., Gianese, F., and Mannucci, P.M. (1999) Dermatan sulphate for the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. DOS (Dermatan sulphate in Oncologic Surgery) Study Group. Thromb. Haemost., 82, 30–34.[Web of Science][Medline]

Faissner, A., Clement, A., Lochter, A., Streit, A., Mandl, C., and Schachner, M. (1994) Isolation of a neural chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan with neurite outgrowth promoting properties. J. Cell Biol., 126, 783–799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fransson, L.A. (1968) Structure of dermatan sulfate. 3. The hybrid structure of dermatan sulfate from umbilical cord. J. Biol. Chem., 243, 1504–1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fransson, L.A., Coster, L., Malmstrom, A., and Sheehan, J.K. (1982) Self association of scleral proteodermatan sulfate. Evidence for interaction via the dermatan sulfate side chains. J. Biol. Chem., 257, 6333–6338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fransson, L.A., Havsmark, B., and Silverberg, I. (1990) A method for the sequence analysis of dermatan sulphate. Biochem. J., 269, 381–388.[Medline]

Fransson, L.A. and Roden, L. (1967a) Structure of dermatan sulfate. I. Degradation by testicular hyaluronidase. J. Biol. Chem., 242, 4161–4169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fransson, L.A. and Roden, L. (1967b) Structure of dermatan sulfate. II. Characterization of products obtained by hyaluronidase digestion of dermatan sulfate. J. Biol. Chem., 242, 4170–4175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guo, B.P., Norris, S.J., Rosenberg, L.C., and Hook, M. (1995) Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi to the proteoglycan decorin. Infect. Immun., 63, 3467–3472.[Abstract]

Guo, Y.C. and Conrad, H.E. (1989) The disaccharide composition of heparins and heparan sulfates. Anal. Biochem., 176, 96–104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hikino, M., Mikami, T., Faissner, A., Vilela-Silva, A.C., Pavao, M.S., and Sugahara, K. (2003) Oversulfated dermatan sulfate exhibits neurite outgrowth-promoting activity toward embryonic mouse hippocampal neurons: implications of dermatan sulfate in neuritogenesis in the brain. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 43744–43754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hitchcock, A.M., Costello, C.E., and Zaia, J. (in press) Glycoform quantification of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate using an LC/MS/MS platform. Biochem., 45, 2350–2361.

Hocking, A.M., Shinomura, T., and McQuillan, D.J. (1998) Leucine-rich repeat glycoproteins of the extracellular matrix. Matrix Biol., 17, 1–19.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hoffman, P., Linker, A., and Meyer, K. (1957) The acid mucopolysaccharides of connective tissues. II. Further experiments on chondroitin sulfate B. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 69, 435–440.[Medline]

Karamanos, N.K., Axelsson, S., Vanky, P., Tzanakakis, G.N., and Hjerpe, A. (1995) Determination of hyaluronan and galactosaminoglycan disaccharides by high-performance capillary electrophoresis at the attomole level. Applications to analyses of tissue and cell culture proteoglycans. J. Chromatogr. A, 696, 295–305.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Karamanos, N.K., Hjerpe, A., Tsegenidis, T., Engfeldt, B., and Antonopoulos, C.A. (1988) Determination of iduronic acid and glucuronic acid in glycosaminoglycans after stoichiometric reduction and depolymerization using high-performance liquid chromatography and ultraviolet detection. Anal. Biochem., 172, 410–419.[Medline]

Kitagawa, H., Tsutsumi, K., Tone, Y., and Sugahara, K. (1997) Developmental regulation of the sulfation profile of chondroitin sulfate chains in the chicken embryo brain. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 31377–31381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Krumdieck, R., Hook, M., Rosenberg, L.C., and Volanakis, J.E. (1992) The proteoglycan decorin binds C1q and inhibits the activity of the C1 complex. J. Immunol., 149, 3695–3701.[Abstract]

Lamari, F.N., Militsopoulou, M., Mitropoulou, T.N., Hjerpe, A., and Karamanos, N.K. (2002) Analysis of glycosaminoglycan-derived disaccharides in biologic samples by capillary electrophoresis and protocol for sequencing glycosaminoglycans. Biomed. Chromatogr., 16, 95–102.[Medline]

Liaw, P.C., Becker, D.L., Stafford, A.R., Fredenburgh, J.C., and Weitz, J.I. (2001) Molecular basis for the susceptibility of fibrin-bound thrombin to inactivation by heparin cofactor ii in the presence of dermatan sulfate but not heparin. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 20959–20965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lyon, M., Deakin, J.A., and Gallagher, J.T. (2002) The mode of action of heparan and dermatan sulfates in the regulation of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. J. Biol. Chem., 277, 1040–1046.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maimone, M.M. and Tollefsen, D.M. (1990) Structure of a dermatan sulfate hexasaccharide that binds to heparin cofactor II with high affinity. J. Biol. Chem., 265, 18263–18271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Malmstrom, A. (1984) Biosynthesis of dermatan sulfate. II. Substrate specificity of the C-5 uronosyl epimerase. J. Biol. Chem., 259, 161–165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Malmstrom, A. and Aberg, L. (1982) Biosynthesis of dermatan sulphate. Assay and properties of the uronosyl C-5 epimerase. Biochem. J., 201, 489–493.[Web of Science][Medline]

Malmstrom, A. and Fransson, L.A. (1975) Biosynthesis of dermatan sulfate. I. Formation of L-iduronic acid residues. J. Biol. Chem., 250, 3419–3425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McClellan, J.E., Costello, C.E., O’Connor, P.B., and Zaia, J. (2002) Influence of charge state on product ion mass spectra and the determination of 4S/6S sulfation sequence of chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharides. Anal. Chem., 74, 3760–3771.[Medline]

Meyer, K. and Rapport, M.M. (1950) The hydrolysis of chondroitin sulfate by testicular hyaluronidase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 27, 287–293.

Militsopoulou, M., Lamari, F.N., Hjerpe, A., and Karamanos, N.K. (2002) Determination of twelve heparin- and heparan sulfate-derived disaccharides as 2-aminoacridone derivatives by capillary zone electrophoresis using ultraviolet and laser-induced fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis, 23, 1104–1109.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mitropoulou, T.N., Lamari, F., Syrokou, A., Hjerpe, A., and Karamanos, N.K. (2001) Identification of oligomeric domains within dermatan sulfate chains using differential enzymic treatments, derivatization with 2-aminoacridone and capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 22, 2458–2463.[Medline]

Pavao, M.S., Mourao, P.A., Mulloy, B., and Tollefsen, D.M. (1995) A unique dermatan sulfate-like glycosaminoglycan from ascidian. Its structure and the effect of its unusual sulfation pattern on anticoagulant activity. J. Biol. Chem., 270, 31027–31036.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Penc, S.F., Pomahac, B., Winkler, T., Dorschner, R.A., Eriksson, E., Herndon, M., and Gallo, R.L. (1998) Dermatan sulfate released after injury is a potent promoter of fibroblast growth factor-2 function. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 28116–28121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Poblacion, C.A. and Michelacci, Y.M. (1986) Structural differences of dermatan sulfates from different origins. Carbohydr. Res., 147, 87–100.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rapport, M., Meyer, K., and Linker, A. (1951) Analysis of the products formed on hydrolysis of hyaluronic acid by testicular hyaluronidase. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 2416–2420.[CrossRef]

Rosenberg, L.C., Choi, H.U., Tang, L.H., Johnson, T.L., Pal, S., Webber, C., Reiner, A., and Poole, A.R. (1985) Isolation of dermatan sulfate proteoglycans from mature bovine articular cartilages. J. Biol. Chem., 260, 6304–6313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saad, O.M. and Leary, J.A. (2003) Compositional analysis and quantification of heparin and heparan sulfate by electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 75, 2985–2995.[Medline]

Sampaio, L.de.O., Bayliss, M.T., Hardingham, T.E., and Muir, H. (1988) Dermatan sulphate proteoglycan from human articular cartilage. Variation in its content with age and its structural comparison with a small chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan from pig laryngeal cartilage. Biochem. J., 254, 757–764.[Web of Science][Medline]

Sugahara, K., Takemura, Y., Sugiura, M., Kohno, Y., Yoshida, K., Takeda, K., Khoo, K.H., Morris, H.R., and Dell, A. (1994) Chondroitinase ABC-resistant sulfated trisaccharides isolated from digests of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate chains. Carbohydr. Res., 255, 165–182.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Takagaki, K., Kojima, K., Majima, M., Nakamura, T., Kato, I., and Endo, M. (1992) Ion-spray mass spectrometric analysis of glycosaminoglycan oligosaccharides. Glycoconj. J., 9, 174–179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Theocharis, D.A., Papageorgacopoulou, N., Vynios, D.H., Anagnostides, S.T., and Tsiganos, C.P. (2001) Determination and structural characterisation of dermatan sulfate in the presence of other galactosaminoglycans. J. Chromatogr. B. Biomed Sci. Appl., 754, 297–309.[Medline]

Tiedemann, K., Larsson, T., Heinegard, D., and Malmstrom, A. (2001) The glucuronyl C5-epimerase activity is the limiting factor in the dermatan sulfate biosynthesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 391, 65–71.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tiedemann, K., Olander, B., Eklund, E., Todorova, L., Bengtsson, M., Maccarana, M., Westergren-Thorsson, G., and Malmstrom, A. (2005) Regulation of the chondroitin/dermatan fine structure by transforming growth factor-{beta}1 through effects on polymer-modifying enzymes. Glycobiology, 15, 1277–1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Toyoda, H., Kinoshita-Toyoda, A., and Selleck, S.B. (2000) Structural analysis of glycosaminoglycans in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans and demonstration that tout-velu, a Drosophila gene related to EXT tumor suppressors, affects heparan sulfate in vivo. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 2269–2275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Toyoda, H., Yamamoto, H., Ogino, N., Toida, T., and Imanari, T. (1999) Rapid and sensitive analysis of disaccharide composition in heparin and heparan sulfate by reversed-phase ion-pair chromatography on a 2 µm porous silica gel column. J. Chromatogr. A, 830, 197–201.[CrossRef]

Trowbridge, J.M. and Gallo, R.L. (2002) Dermatan sulfate: new functions from an old glycosaminoglycan. Glycobiology, 12, 117R–125R.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Trowbridge, J.M., Rudisill, J.A., Ron, D., and Gallo, R.L. (2002) Dermatan sulfate binds and potentiates activity of keratinocyte growth factor (FGF-7). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 42815–42820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vicente, C.P., Zancan, P., Peixoto, L.L., Alves-Sa, R., Araujo, F.S., Mourao, P.A., and Pavao, M.S. (2001) Unbalanced effects of dermatan sulfates with different sulfation patterns on coagulation, thrombosis and bleeding. Thromb. Haemost., 86, 1215–1220.[Medline]

Yamaguchi, Y., Mann, D.M., and Ruoslahti, E. (1990) Negative regulation of transforming growth factor-beta by the proteoglycan decorin. Nature, 346, 281–284.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zaia, J. and Costello, C.E. (2001) Compositional analysis of glycosaminoglycans by electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 73, 233–239.[Medline]

Zaia, J., Li, X.Q., Chan, S.Y., and Costello, C.E. (2003) Tandem mass spectrometric strategies for determination of sulfation positions and uronic acid epimerization in chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 14, 1270–1281.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zaia, J., McClellan, J.E., and Costello, C.E. (2001) Tandem mass spectrometric determination of the 4S/6S sulfation sequence in chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharides. Anal. Chem., 73, 6030–6039.[Medline]

Zamfir, A., Seidler, D.G., Kresse, H., and Peter-Katalinic, J. (2003) Structural investigation of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate oligosaccharides from human skin fibroblast decorin. Glycobiology, 13, 733–742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Zaia and X. Shi
Reply to Savolainen: Organ- and Cell-specific GAG Chains
J. Biol. Chem., May 1, 2009; 284(18): le2 - le2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
N. Volpi and F. Maccari
Structural characterization and antithrombin activity of dermatan sulfate purified from marine clam Scapharca inaequivalvis
Glycobiology, April 1, 2009; 19(4): 356 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
A. M. Hitchcock, K. E. Yates, S. Shortkroff, C. E. Costello, and J. Zaia
Optimized extraction of glycosaminoglycans from normal and osteoarthritic cartilage for glycomics profiling
Glycobiology, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 25 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/6/502    most recent
cwj093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zaia, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zaia, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?