Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zuegg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gready, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zuegg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gready, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Glycobiology, 2000, Vol. 10, No. 10 959-974
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Molecular dynamics simulation of human prion protein including both N-linked oligosaccharides and the GPI anchor

Johannes Zuegg and Jill E. Gready1

Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, P.O. Box 334, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

Although glycosylation appears to protect prion protein (PrPC) from the conformational transition to the disease-associated scrapie form (PrPSc), available NMR structures are for non-glycosylated PrPC, only. To investigate the influence of both the two N-linked glycans, Asn181 and Asn197, and of the GPI anchor attached to Ser230, on the structural, dynamical and electrostatic behavior of PrP, we have undertaken molecular dynamics simulations on the C-terminal region of human prion protein HuPrP(90–230), with and without the three glycans. The simulations used the AMBER94 force field in a periodic box model with explicit water molecules, considering all long-range electrostatic interactions. The results suggest the structured part of the protein, HuPrP(127–227) is stabilized overall from addition of the glycans, specifically by extensions of Helix-B and Helix-C and reduced flexibility of the linking turn containing Asn197, although some regions such as residues in the turn (165–170) between Strand-B and Helix-B have increased flexibility. The stabilization appears indirect, by reducing the mobility of the surrounding water molecules, and not from specific interactions such as H bonds or ion pairs. The results are consistent with glycosylation at Asn197 having a stabilizing role, while that at Asn181, in a region with already stable secondary structure, having a more functional role, in agreement with literature suggestions. Due to three negatively charged SiaLex groups per N-glycan, the surface electrostatic properties change to a negative electrostatic field covering most of the C-terminal part, including the surface of Helix-B and Helix-C, while the positively charged N-terminal part PrP(90–126) of undefined structure creates a positive potential. The unusual hydrophilic Helix-A (144–152) is not covered by either of these dominant electrostatic fields, and modeling shows it could readily dimerize in anti parallel fashion. In combination with separate simulations of the GPI anchor in a membrane model, the results show the GPI anchor is highly flexible and would maintain the protein at a distance between 9 and 13 Å from the membrane surface, with little influence on its structure or orientational freedom.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, P.O. Box 334, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. R. Piro, B. T. Harris, K. Nishina, C. Soto, R. Morales, J. R. Rees, and S. Supattapone
Prion Protein Glycosylation Is Not Required for Strain-Specific Neurotropism
J. Virol., June 1, 2009; 83(11): 5321 - 5328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. Linden, V. R. Martins, M. A. M. Prado, M. Cammarota, I. Izquierdo, and R. R. Brentani
Physiology of the Prion Protein
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 673 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Yin, N. Pham, S. Yu, C. Li, P. Wong, B. Chang, S.-C. Kang, E. Biasini, P. Tien, D. A. Harris, et al.
Human prion proteins with pathogenic mutations share common conformational changes resulting in enhanced binding to glycosaminoglycans
PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7546 - 7551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Premzl, J. E. Gready, L. S. Jermiin, T. Simonic, and J. A. Marshall Graves
Evolution of Vertebrate Genes Related to Prion and Shadoo Proteins--Clues from Comparative Genomic Analysis
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2210 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Moudjou, E. Treguer, H. Rezaei, E. Sabuncu, E. Neuendorf, M. H. Groschup, J. Grosclaude, and H. Laude
Glycan-Controlled Epitopes of Prion Protein Include a Major Determinant of Susceptibility to Sheep Scrapie
J. Virol., September 1, 2004; 78(17): 9270 - 9276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Eberl, P. Tittmann, and R. Glockshuber
Characterization of Recombinant, Membrane-attached Full-length Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25058 - 25065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. S. Baron and B. Caughey
Effect of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor-dependent and -independent Prion Protein Association with Model Raft Membranes on Conversion to the Protease-resistant Isoform
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 14883 - 14892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. F. Winklhofer, J. Heske, U. Heller, A. Reintjes, W. Muranyi, I. Moarefi, and J. Tatzelt
Determinants of the in Vivo Folding of the Prion Protein. A BIPARTITE FUNCTION OF HELIX 1 IN FOLDING AND AGGREGATION
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 14961 - 14970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Pan, M. Colucci, B.-S. Wong, R. Li, T. Liu, R. B. Petersen, S. Chen, P. Gambetti, and M.-S. Sy
Novel Differences between Two Human Prion Strains Revealed by Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis
J. Biol. Chem., September 28, 2001; 276(40): 37284 - 37288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.